Wednesday, March 13, 2013

WHEN A SOLDIER CRIES



WHEN A SOLDIER CRIES


Major General Mrinal Suman


The profession of arms is all about management of violence, destruction and death. As it is not easy to muster courage and nerve to kill other human beings, soldiers are trained to acquire a streak of raw ruthlessness and brutality. Consequently, according to common perception, soldiers are supposed to be cold-hearted and unsentimental fighters, totally impervious to emotional weaknesses. It is just not ‘soldierly’ to cry and shed tears like other mortals.

But then as Voltaire said, “Tears are the silent language of grief”. Grief is a fundamental sentiment and spares no one. However, soldiers do not grieve through wailing, howling, weeping and even sobbing. Their grief finds expression not through tears but through their silent anguish. Here are five triggers that overwhelm soldiers’ hearts and make them cringe with pain. 

When he loses in battle

Soldiering is not a profession. It is a commitment that every soldier undertakes with missionary zeal to defend his country. It is a matter of honour for a soldier to fight and win, whatever be the challenges and cost. It is a trait that becomes an inalienable part of every soldier’s character and provides motivational sustenance. Soldiers see themselves as the sole guardians of national security.

Memories of reverses suffered during the Chinese aggression of 1962 still cause immense pain. Despite the fact that ill-equipped and ill-clothed soldiers were not to blame for the failure, scars of retreat in the face of the Chinese onslaught continue to haunt to date. Inability to dominate and crush forces inimical to national interests makes soldiers miserable. They become restless for an opportunity to redeem their lost honour. 

When he loses a mate

Self preservation is a strong natural instinct and subordination of personal interests to organisational interests is against normal human psyche. However, military life is all about camaraderie and group cohesion. Indian military’s shared commitment flows from cohesion developed through rigorous training, caring and emotional bonding. It is not uncommon to see soldiers risk their lives for their colleagues. Soldiers are neither reckless nor impulsive. Their inexplicable behavior is purely due to intense attachment and loyalty to their colleagues and the group.

The worst thing for a soldier is to lose a ‘buddy’. Poignant notes of the ‘Last Post’ send shivers down the toughest of soldiers’ backs. Tears shed in the memory of a fallen comrade are invariably accompanied by a sense of guilt and helplessness. Many tend to blame themselves for their failure to save their colleague’s life. This is the reasons why arms are reversed while bidding final farewell to a friend.

When his leaders let him down

Military as an institution sustains itself on the trust-loyalty equation existing between the leadership and the rank and file. Trust is the expectancy that the followers can rely on a leader’s immaculate personal conduct and professional competence. It flourishes on the credibility that a leader enjoys in his command. Soldiers willingly repose faith in a leader in the belief that he would remain incorruptible and morally upright.

When military leaders indulge in decadent activities, soldiers start wondering whether such leaders deserve their trust and confidence. They get disillusioned and feel let down by the leadership that they had trusted unquestioningly. They cry out in anguish as they find that their icons of morality are unworthy of their trust.

When countrymen fail to understand him

Soldiers’ dedication to duty, loyalty to the nation and willingness for the supreme sacrifice are driven less by material considerations and more by an overwhelming urge to earn love and respect of their countrymen. Therefore, they tend to be very sensitive to adverse publicity and feel betrayed when the national media ignores their contribution and highlights a few aberrations. Worse, Army’s prompt action against transgressing officers is never recognized.

Soldiers do not question subjecting the military to public scrutiny. However, they want it to be done in an objective and balanced manner. Soldiers doing duty in remote and uncongenial areas feel terribly pained when a few acts of misdemeanor and indiscretion are cited to paint a negative picture of the services as a whole. They wonder if the countrymen understand their trials and tribulations. They cry for the nation’s empathy and recognition.

When the government shows apathy

A supportive government’s compassion acts as a major motivator for the soldiers. It is not a question of financial remunerations alone. It is the way a government treats and values its soldiers that matter. The Government has singularly failed to appreciate the intensity of sense of hurt of the soldiers at their continued neglect. Frequent degradation of their status through manipulated pay commission awards has made them skeptical about government’s intent. 

In the recent past, India was witness to the most unfortunate sight of numerous military veterans returning their medals to the President to register their protest against Government’s indifference to their pleas. This episode will certainly go down as a dark chapter in the history of Independent India.

When the government expresses its inability to spare a small piece of suitable land for a war memorial in the capital to honour independent India’s martyrs, it hurts every soldier. They consider it to be an affront to the memory of those who made the supreme sacrifice. The government’s negative attitude and neglect of their genuine grievances leaves the soldiers a disillusioned lot with no one to provide solace.  

Finally

Military is a social organization, albeit highly structured and disciplined. It consists of living human beings with their normal share of sentiments and idiosyncrasies. Soldiers also emote and go through phases of elation and sorrow. It is just that they are trained to keep their emotions under control lest it affects their performance in crisis situations. Their anguish remains muted due to their strong sense of loyalty to the country and to uphold military honour. For that reason, soldiers need to be handled with sensitivity and empathy.*****




2 comments:

  1. An excellent write up .deserves reading by one and all - all country men ,with , publication in print media.These should be published in book forum to enable future generations to see.
    It is great pleasure in reading such articles and feel -yes,there were GENERALS in true sense. There were many of such generals in the past,but this number is diminishing. It is serious concern of everybody and the Nation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. abs right !! a stage has come where the Govt is highlighting these aberrations to degrade the armed forces- to tell the citizens that they r as bad as we (the politicians & bureaucrats) are. lesser said about the press, the better! all sold to vested interests. an example is the recent beheading incident- how come the press knew all details right down to when the new CO joined etc so quick. leaks from the govt. still no answers to who leaked the top secret letter from COAS to PM. i'm ashamed to be a fauji to serve this ungrateful nation!!

    ReplyDelete