Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Of Matters Military: Veterans and Post-Retirement Employment

Of Matters Military: Veterans and Post-Retirement Employment

Major General Mrinal Suman

Media reports of an increasing number of ex-servicemen acting as middlemen and lobbyists for arms dealers has caused considerable concern both in official circles and amongst the veterans’ community. Even the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence has taken note of the issue and has recommended a cooling off period of five years.
Veterans constitute an invaluable pool of highly talented, experienced and disciplined manpower. As they retire at a comparatively younger age and possess good health, they can put in years of useful service in their second career. Therefore, their potential should be harnessed for the good of the country.
However, two major facets must be factored in. One, veterans should not let the environment misuse them for unethical, dishonest and illegal purposes. Two, they must exercise due diligence to ensure that the jobs are commensurate with their rank, status, dignity and expertise. Both the facets are discussed hereunder.
As regards undesirable conduct, it can be of various hues. Some serving senior officers cultivate big corporate houses, in the fond hope of getting post-retirement employment. They circumvent existing restrictions on reemployment with impunity by becoming consultants, advisors and counselors. Such veterans are de-facto agents and are guilty of flouting provisions of India’s defence procurement procedure that explicitly forbids use of agents.
Further, they visit offices of their erstwhile subordinate officers and craftily start probing about the movement of case files. While answering innocuous looking queries, some officers unsuspectingly divulge confidential information. To betray the trust of a trusting junior in such a deceitful manner amounts to treachery and breach of good faith.
Worse, some veterans brazenly attempt to tweak the procurement process by cultivating key functionaries. They corrupt the system by lavishing expensive gifts on them or inviting them to gala parties.
It is sad that many companies look at retired officers solely as liaison men to further their commercial interests. When a retired Brigadier approached a well-known industrialist for a job at an informal meeting, his response was symptomatic of the common misconception. “Can you use your acquaintances to help me get orders? If yes, join me tomorrow. CTC (contracts through contacts) is more important than your CV”, he said candidly.
A few years back, a retired Colonel approached Army Golf Club in Delhi for membership. When quizzed, he admitted that he neither played golf nor possessed a golf set. “My prospective employer wants me to get the membership so that I can host company parties in the club and thus save their funds,” he confessed honestly. 
The second facet of the issue is equally solemn. It pertains to the frenzy for reemployment amongst the veterans. Many veterans are ready to accept any job that comes their way – status, remunerations and working conditions notwithstanding.
A few years ago, a well-known entrepreneur of Gurgaon infamously remarked, “I prefer to employ retired service officers. They are highly competent and cost the least. Where else can you get a Colonel with 30 years of rich experience for 10,000 rupees a month? Even my office staff demands more”.  “I massage their ego by giving everyone the fancy designation. Even the Colonel who keeps a record of all the trucks that go out of my factory is called Vice President (Production Outflow)”, he declared with a mischievous smile.
There have been Chiefs who never hesitated in accepting ambassadorship to unheard of countries – appointments tenable by Joint Secretaries (Major General). It never occurred to them that it was a steep fall from the lofty heights of being a service Chief.
The case of Armed Forces Tribunal is symptomatic of veterans’ desperation for re-employment. Veterans of the rank of Lieutenant Generals (including Vice Chief/Army Commanders) had no inhibitions in lobbying for the jobs tenable by Major Generals, a rank two steps lower.
Some businessmen employ veterans as it gives them a high to have a senior veteran accompanying them with files and brief cases. Some employers get pleasure in ordering the veterans around in front of others for sundry errands. Being paid employees, the veterans dutifully endure. Thus it is not their merit but ‘display-value’ that determines their employment.
At no stage is it being suggested that veterans should not take up reemployment. Far from it. However, unless compelled by extreme financial constraints, veterans must consider all aspects before accepting employment.
An informal survey was carried out to ascertain reasons for veterans’ craze for reemployment. Most common refrains were – ‘I need to do something to pass time’ or ‘cannot sit idle at home doing nothing’ or ‘there is no harm in earning some whiskey money’ or even ‘wife wants me out of the house during the morning household chores’.
Some talk of peer pressure – “Everyone shows disbelief when I tell them that I am enjoying my retired life. They consider it to be an act of sacrilege”. As the pensions are quite adequate, lure of money is not a compelling reason for most veterans.
Notwithstanding the above explanations, it is the lack of hobbies that forces veterans to seek some occupation. Soldiering being a full-time commitment, most service officers fail to develop other pursuits. That is the reason why retirement hits them hard. There is a sudden vacuum and they do not know how to keep themselves busy. Whereas some join NGOs for community service or take to golf and card games, ‘time gets heavy’ on others. Consequently, they accept all sundry jobs, only to have a routine and be busy.
Finally, a word of caution – veterans should never breach the laws of the country by becoming commission agents, howsoever tempting the lucre may be. They should decline jobs that entail their visiting their erstwhile establishments. They will do well to remember the well-established proscriptive norm for ex-soldiers – “once out of office, never in again”.
Additionally, all officers should develop hobbies and other pursuits which can keep them healthily occupied (both mentally and physically). Instead of dreading retirement, they should look forward to it as the golden period of their lives. With family responsibilities duly fulfilled, it is time to spend quality time with spouses and make up for the long periods of separation during the service life.     

Saturday, June 2, 2012

Of Matters Military: Thank God It’s Friday


Of Matters Military: Thank God It’s Friday

Major General Mrinal Suman

Today is Friday – the first of June 2012 – a day of great significance. The government can now heave a sigh of relief as General VK Singh has retired and is out of the way. His tenure at the helm of the Indian army invited undue attention, mostly for ‘inconvenient reasons’. Here is a short recap of the ‘problems’ he created.

He refused to accept the government’s command that he was born in 1950. Worse, he had the temerity to claim that his parents and the military hospital where he was born knew better than the government. As many journalists will have us believe, it amounted to challenging ‘civilian supremacy’ over the armed forces. According to them, the civilian authority can appropriate to itself the right to decide every soldier’s date of birth, school- certificate notwithstanding.

By repeatedly claiming that he was born in 1951, VKS showed a distinct tendency to ‘defy the government’ and thereby strained relations between the services and the ministry. He ‘forgot’ that it is solely the duty of the armed forces to ensure cordiality of relations with the ministry. Being the superior entity, the ministry has no obligation towards that end. Therefore, being the Chief, he was obliged to accept all just/unjust decisions of the ministry in the interest of maintaining cordial relations.

VKS ‘embarrassed’ the government by appealing to the Apex Court for justice. It is fine   with the environment when ministers, governors and other top dignitaries approach courts for relief, even when accused of heinous crimes and swindling enormous funds. VKS forgot that as a Chief he forfeits his fundamental right to seek justice when aggrieved and is expected to swallow all wrong done to him. A segment of media questioned his motives and used innovative invectives like ‘dragging the government to the court’. After all, abstract concepts like ‘honour and reputation’ are totally alien to some.

VKS has also been faulted for his handling of the alleged bribery offer. He is accused of not taking any immediate action against the concerned officer. Notwithstanding the fact that a civilian (an ex-serviceman is a civilian) cannot be arrested by the military police and no enquiry can be ordered by an officer where he himself is the complainant, he should have done ‘something’. His reporting the matter to his superior i.e. the Defence Minister, as mandated by the Defence Services Regulations, is considered inadequate.

In a country where political leaders sell their votes for a few lakhs and where one can buy enough votes to be a Rajya Sabha member with a few crores in pocket, 14 crores is a huge sum. The environment finds VKS’s claim that he said ‘no’ to such an offer to be incredible and far-fetched.

VKS is considered guilty of exposing corrupt practices that that had afflicted the system, thereby disturbing a highly comfortable and rewarding environment. Supply of imported equipment through the public sector companies has been going on for decades. It was common knowledge that these companies were acting solely as traders and making huge profits at the cost of the defence budget. VKS is accused of having acted with ulterior motives to stop the loot.

VKS is also accused of ordering the move of two battalion level forces in January with ‘surreptitious motives’. A media bigwig smelt a rat and suspected a hidden agenda. He considered the movement of 1500 soldiers (from a 11.3 lakh strong force) to be too major a development to be taken lightly. He blamed VKS for causing unnecessary alarm and scare.

More seriously, VKS is guilty of writing a letter to the Prime Minister on two counts. One, he had no business to talk of equipment deficiencies. These have not occurred overnight. In any case, it is the defence ministry that is responsible for national security. It knows ‘what equipment to buy, when to buy and from whom to buy’. The service chiefs should just keep initiating proposals and not sound alarmist. After all, 1962-like occurrences do not take place very often. In a true nationalist spirit, VKS should have lived with the often stated philosophy ‘we will fight with whatever we have’.

Two, VKS should have realised that his letter would not remain consigned to top-secret files. Porosity of Indian officialdom is well known. He was thus instrumental in divulging defence weaknesses to India’s prospective enemies. It is of no consequence that all deficiencies are well known and comprehensively catalogued in documents that are already in public domain. Many leaders were agitated and wanted VKS to be sacked for having the impudence to write a ‘leakable’ letter. 
  
Moral of the Story

·         Always ‘blow with the wind’ (or should one say ‘swim with the tide’). India is more comfortable with conformists than crusaders.
·      Be a passenger, ride the waves, create no ripples, enjoy your tenure and do not disturb the status-quo.
·     Be a good yes-man, develop rapport with the functionaries through social networking and aspire for a governorship/ambassadorship after retirement.
·         Do not be too concerned about India’s defence preparedness. India has been surviving due to God’s munificence and will continue to do so. Why worry?