Acts of Desperation by Soldiers: Humiliation is Invariably the
Trigger
Major General Mrinal Suman
The news of the initiation of disciplinary action against 168
personnel (4 officers including the Commanding Officer, 17 Junior
Commissioned Officers and 147 Other Ranks) of 226 Field Regiment was received with a sense of deep anguish
by all the well wishers of the Indian army. Increasing incidents of collective
indiscipline do not portend well for a military; in fact, they are ominous.
In
a written reply on 26 November 2013, Defence Minister A K Antony informed the Parliament
that 394 army troops had committed suicide and more than 25,063 personnel had
opted for pre-mature retirement in the preceding three years. In addition, over 80 soldiers had
reportedly lost their lives due to fratricide during the last decade.
Acts of collective insubordination, suicides, fratricides, court
cases and applications for pre-mature release are commonly considered as
reflective of the health of a military organisation. What are the disquieting reasons that are compelling Indian soldiers
to resort to such desperate acts? Why have they become so edgy? Where have
the things gone wrong?
Significantly, a recent study on the high suicide rate in the army
by the Defence Institute of Psychological Research held that ‘perceived
humiliation and harassment’ at the hands of superiors often served as the final
‘trigger’ for jawans to resort to extreme acts.
Humiliation: a Complex Psychological Trauma
Humiliation is a vicious psychological experience that impacts a man’s self-esteem,
hurts his ego and abases his sense of pride. It invariably results in the
emotion of shame. Many socio-psychologists consider humiliation to be an
extreme form of psychological abuse. It hits at the core of an individual’s sense
of worth. It generates the feeling of being put down or made to feel less than
one feels oneself to be.
As humiliation is an intricate and multi-dimensional human
perception, different humans react differently when subjected to humiliation.
Some view their experience rather gravely. They feel emotionally battered,
ill-treated, shamed, dishonored and degraded. For them, it becomes an issue of
wounded pride and dehumanisation.
Others may take
humiliation as a humbling experience. Yet, a small minority may accept
humiliation as a corrective chastisement and consider it to be justified to an
extent. Thus, impact and severity of humiliation is dependent on the
discernment and sensitiveness of the humiliated. Some withdraw into their
shells and suffer from apathy and depression. Others seek revenge by inflicting
injuries on others and themselves.
Perilous effects of humiliation can manifest themselves through
various symptoms – cognitive (indecisiveness, anxiety, worrying and
fearfulness), emotional (moodiness, irritability, edginess, hypersensitivity,
short temper and depression), physical (headache, muscle tension, nausea and
insomnia) and behavioural (procrastination, excessive use of alcohol,
nervousness and overreaction). Both interpersonal and group
dynamics are impacted.
Unlike shame, humiliation is always public, involving the humiliator, the
humiliated and the viewers. Humiliation meted out in
comparative privacy is generally less upsetting: severity depends on the extent
of community exposure. The worst part of humiliation is that it is almost impossible to
retract it. It leaves an indelible scar on the psyche of the victim. It bruises
his ego and questions his basic worth.
Soldiers and Humiliation
As seen above, humiliation by itself is pathogenic enough to cause
irreversible damage to the human psyche. Its toxicity increases multifold when humiliation
is inflicted on a person who is already struggling to weather stresses. It is an accepted fact that humiliation and
stress make a lethal combination, resulting in a ‘pressure
cooker effect’. In the case of soldiers, it blows the safety valve that unit
cohesion and military training provide, thereby threatening emotional and psychological
equilibrium of soldiers.
Stress is a euphemism for
describing the consequences of the failure of a human being to respond
appropriately to emotional or physical threats to the
organism, whether actual or imagined. Failure to cope up with the challenges results in extreme
pressures which generate stress. When stress surpasses ability to handle, it
becomes a threat to an individual’s well-being and generates a state of alarm
and adrenaline production.
Challenges in military
life are different than those faced by civilians, both in terms of threat of
physical harm and emotional security. In the case of the Indian army, these
stresses acquire heightened severity due to prolonged deployment in challenging
environment. With an increase in the education level of soldiers’
wives, many are highly qualified and gainfully employed. They prefer to stay at
one place for the sake of their career and children’s education. Resultantly,
soldiers are deprived of family support in times of emotional disturbances. Resultantly, stress
tends to become distress.
In a command oriented and
hierarchical organisation like the army, status-consciousness is an essential trait
of every soldier’s persona. He takes pride in his rank and appointment. When his sense of pride and dignity are abused through
humiliation, the already over-stressed and distressed soldier loses his balance and resorts to
acts of desperation. The resultant ‘fight-or-flight’
response results in acts of extreme violence – a humiliated soldier runs amok,
kills innocent comrades and pumps a bullet in his own head to put an end to the
perceived agony.
Humiliation can be verbal or
physical or circumstantial. In the army, it can be inflicted in a number of ways – demotion (reduction in
rank or responsibility), denial of promotion, public punishment/censure and
neglect through the silent treatment.
Need for Reforms
Times have changed. Earlier, rural
youth with little education and limited demands joined the Indian army. They
were hardy and accepted the privations of the environment without questioning
them. The army of today is more ubiquitous. It draws manpower from all segments
of the society. The current generation of soldiers is much better educated. Having
being exposed to the electronic media, their awareness level is of a much
higher order. They are quick to spot iniquitous and deviant conduct of their
seniors.
Consequently, there has been a
phenomenal rise in the expectations and aspirations of soldiers. They have
become very conscious of their position and sensitive to any threat, real or
perceived, to their self-respect. Like the rest of the society, their value
system is also undergoing major changes. They question various policies and
practices.
Worse,
regular contact with the families through modern telecom keeps soldiers
embroiled in day to day problems faced by the families – children falling sick
or not studying or ill-health of parents or troubles caused by unruly
neighbours. Earlier joint family system took care of many such exigencies.
Inability to be with parents and
family in times of domestic emergencies makes many soldiers suffer from guilt
complex. They feel that they have failed their parents/families. They feel
helpless and become fretful. Their threshold of tolerance goes down. In such a
state, humiliation acts a trigger. They lose their mental balance and act in an
irrational manner. In extreme cases, humiliation generates a feeling of revenge and violent
retaliation.
The army can no longer ignore the realities
of the changing environment. It must appreciate the fact that a modern soldier is
highly conscious of his self-esteem and resents humiliation. Whereas job
related stresses cannot be fully eliminated, measures must be initiated to
ensure that a soldier’s sensibilities are not unduly offended. For that, both
the organisation and the leaders have to undertake reformative steps.
The army as an organisation must
review its work culture. Status of soldiers must be improved. They should be made to feel
wanted and respected. No soldier should ever be asked to
perform jobs which he considers to be ‘unsoldierlike’ and demeaning. To start
with, the much discussed institution of sahayaks (orderlies) should be discarded. No
sahayaks should be allowed in the stations where families are allowed to stay. Most
soldiers abhor sahayak duties and consider them to be degrading. They have to
be coerced or threatened. It is a major issue with most troops and a key cause
for much disaffection.
Similarly, soldiers resent being detailed to cut grass or sweep roads or
maintain golf courses and other facilities. It is a most unbecoming sight for
the public to see soldiers employed on such duties. All tasks related to maintenance
of cantonment facilities should be outsourced to civilian agencies. This single
step will not only spare troops for training but also improve their level of
job satisfaction considerably.
As
regards the leaders, they have to be sensitive to the psychosomatic make-up of
their troops as humiliation is a victim-based phenomenon. Troops from some
areas are more sensitive to the treatment meted out to them than the
others. For example, whereas an
inadvertent use of the word ‘bloody’ by an officer can be misconstrued by some
soldiers to be highly abusive and demeaning, others may view it with
nonchalance.
In addition, changed
environment demands a change in leadership technique. Leaders have to learn to
handle the soldiers with empathy and due concern for their sensitivities. At times, even harmless
looking episodes may get misconstrued and feelings of humiliation may arise
simply because of misapprehension or the state of mind of the victim. Close and
regular interaction helps sort out such perceived misunderstandings and
grievances. The leaders should also be trained to read symptoms of stress
building up in a soldier and initiate corrective action in time.
Soldiers are very sensitive to the way their wives are treated.
There is a need to sensitise the wives of the senior leaders regarding this
aspect. Many cases of indiscipline owe their origin to cases of mistreatment
(real or perceived) in Army Wives Welfare Association (AWWA) meetings. Soldiers’
wives find AWWA meets to be a humiliating experience and have to be coaxed and
cajoled to attend. AWWA is considered by many to be the breeding ground for
dissentions in the army and a major contributory factor in generating disaffection
in many units.
The system of redressal of grievances
must be made more responsive and compassionate. Troops must be convinced that
their genuine concerns would be attended to in a just, fair and time-bound
manner.
Finally
As the above discussion shows, for soldiers, a clearly defined identity based
on self-esteem is of paramount importance and a key motivator. Soldiers draw strength from the standing
that they enjoy amongst their peers and the immediate group (sub-unit/unit). They continuously strive
for recognition as it gives them a sense of accomplishment. Humiliation strikes at the core
of their soldierly pride, makes them feel small and debases their sense of own
worth. Humiliation of a soldier amounts to denting his military honour, the
very source of his sustenance.
Public reprimand and
employment on unsoldierlike duties must be avoided. Punishments carried out to ‘make an example’ of a person and
present a deterrent to others can prove to be grievous for the psyche of the
humiliated soldier. No offence in day to day unit functioning can be serious
enough to warrant such a treatment.
In the case of soldiers who are
already stressed and are on short fuse, humiliation acts as a trigger to
emotional implosion with disastrous consequences. Evelin Lindner, the
eminent trans-disciplinary scholar in humanities calls humiliation as the ‘nuclear
bomb of the emotions’. Military leaders will do well to keep this term in mind and deal with the soldiers
with due compassion and consideration for their sense of pride.
It
must be clarified here that compassion does not mean dilution of discipline. On
the contrary, a compassionate leader acquires moral authority and psychological
ascendency over his command. Troops respect him and trust him. Willing
obedience and discipline are the natural corollary.*****
